Carib Farm.

Bridging climate-smart knowledge gaps for small-scale farmers in the Caribbean.

Scope: 4 weeks

Role: UX Researcher

Team: collaborated with two UX Researchers/Designers, and presented to founder/product owner, Laura MacNeil

Tools: Figma, Miro, Google Suite

Skills: Affinity Mapping, User Interviews, Empathy Mapping, User Journeys, User Surveys

Context.

The Caribbean region is made up of a collection of small islands in a tropical environment that is generally lush but prone to hurricanes. Many of the farms in the region are micro-farms. From her personal experience living in the Caribbean and managing her local market garden, Laura saw how the islands are on the front lines of climate change, farming on them requires fast solutions and an evident lack of reliable farming information. Her passion for this problem space grew until she presented her idea for a solution for a co-learning network (particularly for under-served farmers) to the Caribbean Climate Innovation Center in 2020 and began conducted stakeholder interviews.

Goal.

Our team was brought on board to conduct user research, with two primary goals in mind. First, we were to determine the needs, motivations, and pain points of primary users—the local farmers themselves. Previously in the initial research from 2020, mostly stakeholders and organizational leaders had been interviewed. Now, Carib Farm was ready to understand the true user’s perspective. Our second goal was to discover if the research from 2020 aligned with the post-COVID challenges that Caribbean farming communities now face since the global supply chains had been affected.

Our client wanted the following deliverables to gain a better understanding of their target user as their other teams moved onto developing the beta version of their product:

  • Existing Research - Synthesis Presentation

  • Existing Research - Affinity Map

  • User Research - Interview Script

  • User Research - Interview Recordings

  • User Research - Affinity Map

  • Empathy Maps

  • User Journey Map

In addition to those deliverables, our team compiled a Users Benefit List to be used for strategic marketing and a User Survey to gather a list of interested members. Our team also compiled a final report to summarize our work. Please feel free to take a detailed look at our end-to-end work below:

Synthesizing Initial Research.

Since two years had been dedicated to research, an extensive amount of content had been accumulated—and our team dove right into it. Previously, interviews had been conducted with local and organizational leaders in the Caribbean working to improve the agricultural industry. See the post-its below for more details about these leaders. We immersed ourselves in these existing interviews, listening to the recordings, taking notes, and building out an affinity map to synthesize what had already been found.

Goals/Motivations:

  • Food Security and Sustainable Economic Development
    The region is currently heavily reliant on food imports and the tourism industry. Both can be very fickle and were massively disrupted by COVID. There is a growing awareness of the importance of developing local production both for reasons of food security and economic stability and growth.

  • Empowerment and Changing Mindsets
    One of the interviewees said, ““[...] now that people feel valued, they feel the relish to do the work and to do it well.” There has been a changing perception that the farming industry is not a second-tier job compared to other “white-collar” roles. Feeling valued as a local farmer is fundamental to all of their work.

Challenges:

  • Accessible, affordable financing

  • Access to information and technical support

  • Input shortages from time to time + high cost of inputs

  • Current lack of organization

  • Post-colonial fallout, history of corruption, and the legacy of mistrust

  • Food is closely associated with politics

Please view the slide deck below for the full analysis of the existing research:

New Research Questions.

From the current research, a solid picture of the farming industry in the Caribbean was painted for our team from the existing interviews with organizational leaders. That said, we wanted to focus our next research efforts on the future Carib Farm users, the local farmers themselves. Building off of the previous research, we developed a set of research questions to inform our future user interviews to understand the critical needs of local farmers. Most of these questions pertained to education and technology since those were major gaps in the existing research:

1. How does technology currently fit into the lives of farmers and other members of the agricultural ecosystem in the Caribbean?

2. How do Caribbean farmers currently access information?

3. What information are Caribbean farmers currently accessing?

4. How supported do Caribbean farmers feel?

5. What would they like to see improve/develop in regards to informational resources?

Almost immediately after synthesizing the existing research and interviews, our team wanted to change our planned research method from user interviews to a user survey. We initially thought that the survey would provide us with more quantifiable data about the local farmers than conducting user interviews would. When suggesting this to our client, they expressed some reservations. Through a group call, we realized that our client hadn’t seen our ongoing work yet and was therefore hesitant to trust our change in wanting to solely run a user survey.

After sharing the synthesis of the existing research, our client was much more comfortable and therefore receptive to the suggestions we had to make for the next steps. Through another session of collaboration with the client, our team compared the benefits of user interviews with those of a user survey. During that dialogue, we realized user interviews were still critical to establishing a persona of the local Caribbean farmer. A user survey would not help identify critical needs in the same way that interviews would. As a compromise, we concluded to create a survey for Carib Farm’s future use that was specifically geared towards any remaining gaps in user research after the interviews had been conducted.

Process.

To map out the scope of the project, our team broke down the agreed-upon deliverables into a 4-week project plan.

However, COVID-19 brought much of the project launch to a halt and brought a new shift to the farming industry in the Caribbean in 2022. For more information on Carib Farm, feel free to view the video from the founder below:

To do so, our team created a color code system within Figma, where each interview had a designated color. As we listened to the existing interviews, we noted key details, concepts, and quotes on digital post-its with their corresponding color. After listening to each interview, we began to group post-its with similar content/concepts.

The screenshots below demonstrate this process and the main groups we ended up with:

Key Insights From Existing Research.

The main ideas (noted on the purple circles in the screenshots above) led our team to tease out the goals, motivations, and challenges of farmers in the Caribbean according to the information shared by the leaders in the existing interviews.

Conducting New User Research.

Those questions moving forward shaped the two primary goals of our user interview and its subsequent script:

  1. To discern how farmers currently get answers to their questions about farming, and

  2. To learn how farmers currently communicate with other farmers

Six remote interviews were conducted by our team with pre-approved individuals who we were put in contact with by Carib Farm. Interviewees were all local farmers, young and old, male and female, and living on a variety of different islands (Jamaica, St. Vincent & Grenadine, Barbados, etc).

Key Quotes.

When asked about how farmers currently solve problems they face, two users remarked:

“I ask people who know” [how to solve the problem, whether its other farmers, young people, he has some friends who are scientists and other academics].

“It’s literally about meeting people and being [...] comfortable enough to ask the question [...] also not having so much ego that you think that you know, and also trying to catch problems early.

Specifically, in regards to finding funds and receiving grants for farming equipment/supplies, one farmer highlighted the need for cooperation:

“They will not help me as an individual. You have to do it as a group.

When asked about the current methods farmers use to communicate with and learn from other farmers, two users noted:

“I get it. You always need somebody you can ask questions to, and get information, and meet other farmers, and get training. All of that stuff is so important. But they exist already but in so many different forms.”


“For me, any group that I join, one of my biggest factors of being willing to join, is for meeting people that are willing to work. It doesn’t have to be labor; it could be people who are genuinely willing to partner and also business persons.”

There was a consensus that many communities currently exist, but there is a lack of central organization in these groups as well as a bit of distrust in whether those who are a part of those communities are active participants.

Affinity Mapping.

Our team set out to isolate new themes that arose from the second round of user interviews. To do so, we typed out notes from the interviews that were color-coded according to the interviewee like our first affinity map. The following were common groupings that surfaced during the interviews. The screenshots below highlight two prominent groupings: current problems that local farmers face and current solutions farmers have employed to mitigate such challenges.

To see our full process of synthesizing the second round of interviews, feel free to zoom in and view it in detail below:

Key Insights.

From the mapping, three main problems became apparent:

  1. Lack of cooperation

  2. Lack of education

  3. Lack of finances

One way or another each main problem that the farmers described fell underneath one or more of these main problems. For example, the need for large farming equipment requires substantial finances to afford the expensive machinery. This warrants cooperation from other farmers who may want to buy the machinery together and then share it. Similarly, farmers need to learn about what equipment is best for their produce and farming landscape as well.

Currently, farmers are using a plethora of digital tools to solve their problems and network with one another. Such tools include WhatsApp, Facebook groups, Google, Amazon, YouTube, and the Ministry of Agriculture.

Lastly, farmers unanimously agreed on the benefits of digital communication.

  • saved time (spent traveling, or even across time zones)

  • more engagement

  • recording capabilities (so that people can watch later)

Empathy Maps.

With a better understanding of the problems Caribbean farmers faced in 2022, we created two empathy maps. During our investigation of both the previous and current research, two separate personas presented themselves, most distinctly, older generation farmers who entered into the industry as a side hobby, and younger farmers who are entering the industry with big entrepreneurial ambitions.

So, meet Debra and Ajay!

In the empathy maps below, the blue post-it notes are shared by both Debra and Ajay, while the yellow notes are unique to Debra and the purple ones are only experienced by Ajay.

Both Ajay and Debra experience the challenges that pertain to the land (climate change, shortage of inputs, etc) and other organizational frustrations (overwhelmed Ministry of Agriculture).

That said, the life stages and educational background of these individuals differentiate their pains and motivations slightly. Since Debra has had more time to acquire assets and establish credit, banks are much more inclined to trust her with a loan over Ajay, who as a young farmer, doesn’t have the same financial background. As for education, Ajay went to school to learn more about biotechnology and is much more motivated to become an entrepreneur. Debra is primarily concerned with making her side hobby of selling products at the local market sustainable.

How Might We Questions.

With a shared understanding of the users in question, our team developed How Might We Questions to guide the Carib Farm team as they move into ideation.

How might we help farmers build unity and trust with one another? 

How might we help provide farmers with resources to education and receive information quickly and correctly?

How might we provide farmers with the opportunities to connect with business partners? 

User Journey Map.

In consideration of both Debra and Ajay’s needs, it became clear to create a product that would allow users to connect and learn (either directly from an information warehouse or receive notices of in-person learning opportunities). Since Carib Farm also plans to do a soft launch of their product first, we wanted to create a user journey that would allow users to also “view as a guest” come and see what the app is about (read the daily news) without running into walls of creating an account. Once a user reached the point of committing to joining the community, they gained the opportunity to become an expert, engage in discussion forums, and receive access to networking with businesses networking/partnerships.

Next Steps for Carib Farm.

With the empathy map, how might we questions, and user journey map in place, our team also compiled two other deliverables for the Carib Farm team to use in the future.

The first was a User Benefits List, outlining the gains a user would receive by signing up and joining their beta-product launch. Such benefits included:

1. Connecting and collaborating with trusted members (i.e. for large contracts and cooperatives).

2. Contextualized solutions (i.e. island-specific solutions to island-specific problems).

3. Farmer-to-farmer engagement and encouragement. Open forum allows all voices to be heard.

4. Grow repository of knowledge and create/acknowledge experts.

5. Stimulating innovation.

6. Saved time (previously spent traveling) by being able to communicate virtually.

The second deliverable our team put together was a User Survey. Though Carib Farm now has a clear picture of Debra and Ajay, there are opportunities to research what content farmers specifically want resources about. Our goal in producing this survey for future use was to help the Carib Farm team fulfill two different purposes:

1. Learn what topics farmers want to know about.

2. Get a pulse for community interest and willingness to pay for the product.

The findings from the first goal will inform the information architecture of the official sitemap when it is created, especially when discerning what content will be stored in the knowledge warehouse portion of the app. The findings from the second goal could gather vital marketing information for the team as they move towards the product’s soft launch.

Conclusion.

Overall, most of the previous assumptions from the existing research were confirmed through the second round of user interviews, post-COVID. While there was a vague idea before, now Carib Farm has a sharper focus for product development as their team shifts into ideation and design.

As a researcher, I learned the necessity for clear research goals. Countless hours can be spent looking into the complexities of agricultural issues in developing countries, but narrowing one’s focus easily helped to steer our user interviews in a specific direction.

Lastly, I saw that some products will have multiple personas that need to be considered. Fleshing out two empathy maps will impact the ideation and design of the product since Carib Farm is catering to a wide generational span of users.